Tags: online chess, chess, play chess, chess, chess online, chess, backgammon
Chess Forum
ajaxwrite.com << online chess - < chess - chess > - chess online >>
| From | Message | Posted by knightnothorse
ajaxwrite.com
10/02/2008
11:00:23
Play online chess |  Subject: Annotate during, after, or both?
Message:
I really like the feature that you can annotate your games DURING play..but I wanted to get an opinion if people think its better to annotate after the game instead...perhaps your head is a bit clearer and you can see more of what your opponent was up rather than what your next best move might be? (I know, I know, I should be doing BOTH those things during the game!) The possible downside is that annotating after the game, you might think "Why did I make that move?"...thoughts?
| Posted by ccmcacollister
ajaxwrite.com
10/02/2008
12:09:37
Play online chess | Why not both
Message:
You know more after the game. But might forget something important if you don't note it down at the time. You could do it during then review and add your new notes when you look to see where it could improve. Personally I tend to annotate months later as it takes me a long time to decide if I liked a game, but I probably lose something unless it was during a very serous time and i had reams of subvariations and such.
| Posted by loreta
ajaxwrite.com
10/02/2008
22:33:22
Play online chess | Notes
Message:
I do some notes during game - and after game, sometimes review them (to check/ evaluate my estimations)
———
Chess: Ulf Andersson, positional master — Andersson rarely makes a direct attack: he wins by subtle improvements in position. DK: I've been wanting to tackle positional play in this column for some time, but couldn't think of a good way into a topic that is just too vast – until inspiration came with the arrival of Grandmaster Chess Strategy, by Jurgen Kaufeld and Guido Kern (New In Chess, £19.95). The title is bland, but the strapline reveals the content: "What amateurs can learn from Ulf Andersson's positional masterpieces". Andersson is, for me, an enigmatic chess player: he rarely makes a direct attack on his opponent's king, preferring to exchange pieces and gently improve his position – and against strong chess players this frequently leads to ...
|
|